Effective July 1, 2008
The following fee schedule is established for all cases where the obligation sued upon
provides for attorney’s fees, EXCEPT in Unlawful Detainer actions. This schedule shall
be used by the Clerk and may be used by the Court to fix attorney’s fees in Default
Judgments entered pursuant to CCP § 585.5.
Hi..
Thanks for the clarification..Now another question..Is this for now or
the immediate short term? H-1bs are used up for the FY..They will
become available again Oct. 1, 2009. If he is on OPT until next go
around, the O might still be preferable, or even his only option in
the end, because of the cap, aka the H-1B lottery.
So, a key issue in your decision-making process will depend on his
current status and how long he will be able to stay in it (i.e. until
next October). If he needs this for now and he is not already in H-1b
status, then the O is his only option of the two, regardless of any
other pros/cons…
Vonda
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Antonio Fiorentino Di Stefano
<afiore1961@…> wrote:
> My apology!
> I meant to compare the H-1B visa. The applicant was concerned that the
> employer is opting for 0-1 instead of the H-1B.
>
> Thanks
>
> — In immlog@yahoogroups.com, “Vonda K Vandaveer” <vkvandaveer@…>
> wrote:
>>
>> Good afternoon:
>> I am not sure I understand your question. You said his other option is
>> for a B visa. He generally can’t work on a B visa (setting aside such
>> special cases as B in lieu of H-1b scenarios).
>>
>> Are you talking about using the O instead of OPT?
>>
>> Vonda
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Antonio F. Di Stefano
>> <afiore1961@…> wrote:
>> > A graphic designer here on a student visa gets an offer from a company
>> > involved in marketing and advertising in the Hispanic market. They
>> > offer to secure a O-1 visa - probably relying on several prizes
>> > applicant has won in his country of origin What is the
> disadvantage in a
>> > O-1 visa for someone with dual intent - who is looking at the long
> term
>> > - as opposed to going for a B-1 visa?
>> > Thank you.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> –
>> Vonda K. Vandaveer
>> Attorney at Law
>>
>> V.K. Vandaveer, P.L.L.C.
>> P.O. Box 27317
>> Washington, DC 20038-7317
>> Phone:(202) 340-1215
>> Fax:(202) 521-0599
>> Website: http://www.vkvlaw.com/
>>
>> Business and Immigration Law Blog
>> http://vkvisalaw.wordpress.com/
>>
>> Family Visa Law Blog
>> http://vkvisafamilylaw.wordpress.com/
>>
>> Licensed in Washington, DC and CA
There has never been a reason not to use the admin interface but
that said with the versatility and flexibility of WordPress many people
have taken advantage and built softwares that resist you from doing so.
To be quite frank, I hardly use the Admin interface except for
approving and replying to comments and managing plugins and themes, but
in doing that, I am definitely missing so many of the features that
WordPress posting interface provides me with.
WordPress 2.6 makes use of Google Gears when available to speedup
and cache static files that are loaded every time you visit your
WordPress admin panel.
Auto Insurance / incomplete investigation and invasion of privacy
Auto Insurance / incomplete investigation and invasion of privacy
Business Name: AAA Insurance (California State Automobile Association
Inter-Insurance Bureau)
Address: PO Box 920 Suisun City, CA 94585-0920
Phone: 888-582-3008 (Claims Department)
Nature of complaint: invasion of privacy, mishandling of an insurance claim
California Code of Regulations, Title 10, Chapter 5
Article 1. Fair Claims Settlement Practices
Section 2695.2. Definitions. As used in these regulations:
(c) “Claimant” means first or third party claimant as defined in these
regulations, any person who asserts a right of recovery under a surety
bond, an attorney, any person authorized by operation of law to
represent the claimant, or any of the following persons properly
designated by the claimant in the manner specified in subsection
2695.5(c): an insurance adjuster, a public adjuster, or any member of
the claimants family.
…
subsection 2695.5(c) The designation specified in subsection 2695.2(c) shall be in
writing, signed and dated by the claimant, and shall indicate that the
designated person is authorized to handle the claim. All designations
shall be transmitted to the insurer and shall be valid from the date of
execution until the claim is settled or the designation is revoked. A
designation may be revoked by a writing transmitted to the insurer,
signed and dated by the claimant, indicating that the designation is to
be revoked and the effective date of the revocation.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Powered by WordPress
